Binance co-founder Yi He has warned users to be cautious with USDT and other crypto with an unclear origin. That includes funds bought cheaply, received through relatives, or moved for someone else. Her November 8 post on X did not announce a regional ban or new screening rules, but deposits linked to flagged addresses may prompt questions or restrictions.
- Yi He cited discounted USDT, funds handled for others, and payments connected to business in Myanmar or collection in Cambodia.
- A compliance review is not proof of wrongdoing, and it is separate from a legal order freezing assets.
- Binance has not disclosed specific screening thresholds, affected accounts, or required documents for these examples.
Why a deposit may be reviewed
Yi He’s examples included USDT bought at a discount from friends, tokens received through relatives, and funds temporarily moved through an account for someone else. Her post also referred, in the reported translation, to “money from doing business in Myanmar” and “money collected in Cambodia.”
A discount alone does not make a transaction suspicious. The concern is a deal with an unclear or poorly documented origin, especially when the sender or the route the funds took cannot be explained.
Binance says its compliance systems can identify risky wallet addresses linked to incoming deposits. The company has not publicly explained its thresholds or how it assesses a particular address. A flag can prompt scrutiny, but it is not proof that a customer has done anything wrong.
The exchange may ask for the source of funds, meaning the origin of a specific deposit, even if a customer has already completed identity verification. Identity checks establish who the customer is. Source-of-funds questions ask where particular money or tokens came from.
A request for information may lead to a temporary account restriction while Binance reviews a transaction. Some reviews can be resolved by providing supporting records. A restriction imposed under an applicable law-enforcement order is a separate matter with different procedures. Binance may not be able to release assets while such an order remains in force.
No regional ban announced
Yi He did not identify specific wallet addresses or customer accounts, say how many people had been affected, or announce a ban on deposits connected to Myanmar or Cambodia. Her post also did not specify new screening rules or thresholds.
The countries named in her examples are not evidence against any individual transaction. A payment’s geography does not establish that it is criminal. For a review, what matters is the transaction’s history and whether the customer can explain and document the transfer.
That can be difficult when someone accepts tokens on behalf of a friend or relative. The account holder may become the visible intermediary while knowing little about the funds’ earlier path. Keeping records of who sent a payment, why it was sent, and any underlying business or agreement can help explain a legitimate transfer. Binance has not publicly listed the documents it would require for each scenario.
Key questions and answers
-
Which transactions did Yi He warn about?
Her examples included discounted USDT purchases, funds received through relatives, money moved for others, and payments described in the translated post as connected to business in Myanmar or collection in Cambodia.
-
Does buying USDT below market price automatically make it suspicious?
No. The concern is an unusually cheap or poorly documented offer with an origin that cannot be explained, not every discounted purchase.
-
Does Binance’s warning mean deposits from Myanmar or Cambodia are banned?
No regional ban was announced. Yi He’s post also did not disclose new screening rules or thresholds.
-
What records should customers keep?
Keep transfer records and any relevant invoices, written agreements, or messages showing who sent the funds and why. Binance has not specified which documents it would require in every case.
-
Is a Binance review the same as a law-enforcement freeze?
No. An exchange review is a compliance process. A restriction imposed under an applicable official order is a separate legal matter. A flagged transaction is not, on its own, proof of wrongdoing. See Binance’s reported sanctions-breach allegations for related compliance scrutiny.
For broader context on Binance’s business and legal position, see its response to sale rumors and openness to partnerships.
