Bitcoin Bull Case Holds as Scaramucci Says Selloff Is Forced Liquidation, Not Broken Fundamentals

Daily Feed
Bitcoin Bull Case Holds as Scaramucci Says Selloff Is Forced Liquidation, Not Broken Fundamentals

Bitcoin’s pullback has rattled traders, but Anthony Scaramucci says the bull case is still alive and well. The market may be bleeding out weak hands, not breaking Bitcoin’s long-term thesis.

  • 21 million cap: Bitcoin cannot be debased by governments.
  • Forced selling: miners, leverage, and macro stress are pressuring price.
  • Institutional rails: spot Bitcoin ETFs and big finance are here to stay.
  • Gold comparison: BTC still has massive upside if it keeps taking store-of-value share.
  • Fear can be a signal: extreme pessimism has often marked major reversals.

Bitcoin slid from above $70,000 to around $59,000 before stabilizing in the $63,000 to $65,000 range, and the usual parade of doom merchants quickly showed up to declare the whole thing dead. Same old circus. Price gets hammered, leverage gets wiped, and suddenly everyone forgets that Bitcoin has spent its entire life making people look silly for panicking too early.

Anthony Scaramucci, founder of SkyBridge Capital and a longtime Bitcoin bull, laid out five reasons to stay long BTC for patient capital. His case is straightforward: the current selloff looks like a temporary liquidation event, not a collapse in fundamentals. That distinction matters. A market can get ugly without the underlying asset turning into trash.

The first reason is the simplest and strongest: Bitcoin has a fixed supply of 21 million coins. That matters because it makes Bitcoin the only major asset that governments cannot debase by printing more of it. Debasement, for readers new to the term, means reducing purchasing power by increasing supply. Fiat currencies can be diluted by central banks. Bitcoin cannot. Its supply schedule is enforced by code, not promises, and that is the whole damn point.

Scaramucci framed that scarcity against a larger backdrop of debt and monetary instability. U.S. gross national debt has passed $37 trillion, and in that kind of environment, an asset with a hard cap starts looking less like a speculative toy and more like a scarce monetary reserve. Bitcoin does not care how many press releases come out of Washington.

His second point is that the current pressure on price is being driven by forced sellers, not broken fundamentals. In plain English, forced selling happens when traders or funds have to dump assets because they owe money, need cash, or are getting liquidated. That includes:

  • miners selling BTC to cover operating costs
  • leveraged traders being forced out of positions
  • macro stress hitting risk assets
  • ETF outflows adding short-term pressure
  • geopolitical tension making markets skittish

Scaramucci put it bluntly:

“This selloff is forced sellers — miners covering costs, leverage unwinding — not broken fundamentals.”

That is a key point, because Bitcoin often looks broken right before it resumes doing what it always does: punishing overconfident traders and rewarding people with a longer horizon. Miners selling is not some mystical indictment of BTC. It is business reality. After the halving, margins get tighter and some miners have to sell more coins just to keep the lights on. That can create short-term supply pressure without changing Bitcoin’s long-term value proposition one bit.

The third reason Scaramucci remains bullish is that the infrastructure around Bitcoin is no longer a fringe experiment. Since the spot Bitcoin ETFs launched in early 2024, those products have accumulated over 1 million BTC combined. That is not trivia. It means Bitcoin now has permanent institutional rails: custody, brokerage access, advisor channels, and ETF wrappers that let traditional investors get exposure without touching self-custody on day one.

BlackRock, Fidelity, and Morgan Stanley are part of that setup, and that matters because institutional capital is sticky in a way that hype cycles are not. When a pension, wealth platform, or registered investment advisor allocates to BTC, that capital tends to move more slowly than retail speculative flows. That does not make Bitcoin less volatile in the short term. It does make adoption harder to reverse once the plumbing is in place.

“The institutional rails built since 2024 are permanent.”

And that is the hidden story most short-term traders miss. Bitcoin is no longer operating in a vacuum. It has been plugged into the old financial system, which is ironic and useful at the same time. The suits can complain all they want, but the rails are being laid, and the train is already moving.

Scaramucci’s fourth reason is valuation upside. Bitcoin’s market cap is roughly $1.3 trillion. Gold sits around $29 trillion. That comparison matters because both assets compete for store-of-value demand. A store of value is something people hold to preserve purchasing power over time. Gold has been doing that for centuries. Bitcoin is trying to do it with code, a fixed supply, and a network that settles value without needing a bank as the middleman.

If Bitcoin captured even 10% of gold’s store-of-value role, its market cap could rise by roughly $2.9 trillion. That would put BTC well above $200,000 per coin. That is not a prediction that Bitcoin will politely go there on schedule. It is a way of showing that the upside remains enormous if BTC keeps taking share from older monetary assets.

Scaramucci has previously projected $170,000 by mid-2026 and $200,000 by the end of 2026. He and Mike Novogratz also reportedly said Bitcoin could reclaim $70,000 by the end of July. Those targets are fine as directional views, but they are not sacred scripture. Price targets are often where crypto gets sloppy, and there is no shortage of shameless moon-boy nonsense floating around this market. A number on a chart is not a thesis. A thesis is a reason why demand should exist over time.

“capturing even 10% of gold’s role would be ‘a multiple, not a percentage’”

The fifth reason Scaramucci stays long is historical sentiment. Major Bitcoin bottoms often form when fear is at its ugliest. Right now sentiment is sitting in “Extreme Fear” territory, which is exactly the kind of mood that has historically produced the best entries for people with actual conviction. That does not mean fear is always a buy signal. Plenty of assets stay cheap for good reasons. But Bitcoin has a habit of turning the market’s emotional breakdown into someone else’s opportunity.

“max pessimism is the entry point”

That line is worth taking seriously, even if it sounds a little too neat. Market bottoms are rarely marked by celebration. They are usually marked by exhaustion, sarcasm, and a lot of people swearing they are “done with crypto” right before the next leg begins. Bitcoin has built a career out of making people capitulate at the wrong time.

There is still a real bear case to consider, because pretending BTC only moves in one direction is how people end up holding bags while yelling about “the fundamentals.” ETF demand can slow. Macroeconomic conditions can tighten. Miners can continue selling. And if the broader risk market rolls over hard, Bitcoin can get dragged around like a loose shopping cart in a windstorm. Strong long-term fundamentals do not protect anyone from a brutal interim drawdown.

Near-term levels still matter. Resistance sits around $65,000, while support is near $63,500. A clean break above that zone could open a move toward $67,200 and then a retest of $70,000. If BTC loses $60,000, the next pressure point could be around $59,300 or lower. So yes, the structural thesis may remain intact, but the chart can still punch you in the mouth before it agrees.

The gold comparison is also worth a reality check. Gold is not just a store of value; it also has industrial use, jewelry demand, and centuries of monetary history behind it. Bitcoin is still proving itself as digital hard money. That makes the upside arguably larger, but also the risk higher. BTC does not need to replace gold outright to succeed. It only needs to keep earning a role as a scarce, portable, censorship-resistant asset. That is a smaller claim than “replace everything,” and it is already a powerful one.

What makes the current setup interesting is that Bitcoin’s bull case is no longer just a trader’s fantasy. It now rests on three concrete pillars:

  • Scarcity: 21 million coins, full stop
  • Access: ETFs and institutional channels
  • Demand potential: more room to absorb store-of-value flows, especially versus gold

That does not mean a straight line higher. Bitcoin is too volatile and too early for that kind of fantasy. But it does mean the asset has crossed a threshold where the old “it’s just internet money” dismissal is embarrassingly outdated. Bitcoin is now embedded in the financial system, whether the legacy crowd likes it or not.

Does Bitcoin’s recent drop kill the long-term thesis?

No. The case being made here is that the decline reflects forced selling, leverage unwind, and macro pressure rather than a failure of Bitcoin’s fundamentals.

Why does the 21 million cap matter so much?

Because it gives Bitcoin scarcity that cannot be changed by governments or central banks. That protects it from debasement and gives it a hard-money appeal that fiat currencies do not have.

Why are spot Bitcoin ETFs important?

They give institutions and traditional investors a regulated way to buy BTC, and that creates lasting market infrastructure. Once those rails exist, they are not easily undone by a temporary price decline.

Can Bitcoin still outperform gold?

Yes. If BTC captures even a modest share of gold’s store-of-value demand, the implied upside remains huge. That is the core of the bullish valuation argument.

Is “Extreme Fear” a warning sign or an opportunity?

It can be both. Fear is not magic, but deep pessimism has often appeared near major Bitcoin reversals. For long-term buyers, that can be a better setup than chasing green candles.

Should Bitcoin holders sell now?

Not necessarily. If the time horizon is long and the position size is sane, the pullback looks more like a volatility event than a thesis break. If the position was bought as a quick flip, that is a different mess entirely.

Scaramucci’s message is basically this: the market is forcing out weak hands, but it is not invalidating Bitcoin. That is an important distinction in an asset class where people confuse price with truth every five minutes. Bitcoin can fall hard and still be one of the cleanest monetary bets in the market. It can also make fools out of anyone who thinks conviction means never getting shaken. The believers are not buying a straight line. They are buying scarcity, adoption, and the ugly truth that hard money tends to look ridiculous right before it looks obvious.

Share this article

Back to Blog