Circle shares climbed more than 7% on Monday after Bernstein reiterated an Outperform rating, kept its $140 price target, and the company moved closer to launching Arc on Sept. 16. The stock closed at $66.67 on the New York Stock Exchange, after hitting an intraday high of $68.40.
- CRCL rose on analyst support and Arc’s approaching mainnet launch
- Bernstein still sees upside beyond reserve income on USDC
- Circle’s growth is real, but its business still leans heavily on stablecoin reserves
- Tether remains the giant Circle has to claw share from
The market is still trying to pin down what Circle Internet Group really is. Is it a stablecoin issuer that makes money on reserve assets? Or is it a broader crypto-financial infrastructure company building payments rails, settlement tools, and a blockchain for institutions?
That split matters because the valuation story changes depending on the answer. A company living mostly off stablecoin reserve income is one thing. A company with recurring payments revenue, infrastructure fees, and a live blockchain that institutions actually use is something else entirely.
Bernstein clearly thinks investors are still pricing Circle too narrowly. The firm said the market continues to view Circle as a pure-play stablecoin business, “tethered to interest income on reserves, ” while underappreciating its longer-term monetization potential through payments and infrastructure. In plain English: don’t mistake the yield on reserve assets for the whole business.
The latest quarter supports both the bullish and skeptical reads. Circle reported second-quarter revenue of about $701 million, up 7% year-over-year. But adjusted earnings per share came in at $0.18, below the $0.26 consensus estimate. Revenue moved in the right direction, but profits still came in lighter than expected.
That miss is a useful reminder that crypto revenue stories can look cleaner on a slide deck than they do in a P&L. Growth is nice. So is beating estimates.
Still, the operating metrics were hard to ignore. USDC circulating supply increased 19% year-over-year to $73.3 billion, and onchain transaction volume jumped 151% to $14.8 trillion. Those figures point to real usage of Circle’s stablecoin and its network, though they do not automatically prove that all of that activity reflects organic end-user payments. Some of it may include trading, treasury movement, arbitrage, or other financial churn that is common in crypto.
Even so, the direction matters. More USDC in circulation usually means more demand for Circle’s dollar-linked rails. More onchain volume suggests the company’s infrastructure is being used at scale, even if the exact mix of use cases is still doing some heavy lifting behind the curtain.
The bigger catalyst is Arc, Circle’s blockchain initiative, which is scheduled to launch its public mainnet on Sept. 16. A mainnet is the live version of a blockchain where real transactions take place, as opposed to a test environment where nothing of consequence is at risk.
Circle has described Arc as an “institutional-grade” chain. That is marketing language, sure, but it also signals the target audience: regulated financial firms, payment providers, and businesses that care about compliance, settlement speed, and interoperability more than they care about blockchain tribalism.
Circle also secured regulatory milestones that strengthen that pitch. The company said it obtained authorization from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and a New York State trust charter. Those are not the same thing, and neither should be blurred into generic “approvals.” But both matter because trust-charter status and federal authorization can make Circle easier to work with for institutions that want clearer regulatory footing.
That is the real game here. Circle is trying to move from being seen as a stablecoin issuer into a regulated financial infrastructure company. That means more than simply printing USDC and collecting spread from reserves. It means trying to own the rails.
To reinforce that story, Circle named BlackRock and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) as early validators for Arc. The significance depends on what “validator” means in practice, and Circle did not spell out a deeper technical role in the material available here. But the names are not random. BlackRock brings heavyweight institutional credibility, while DTCC sits near the center of traditional market settlement plumbing. Even if the optics matter more than the technical detail right now, optics count when you are trying to sell a new chain to institutions that hate surprises.
Circle also mentioned a patent-related collaboration with IBM, though the details were not disclosed. For now, that is more a signal of corporate relationship-building than a concrete product announcement. Nice to have, not enough to build a thesis on.
The strategic question is whether Circle can turn these developments into revenue that is less sensitive to interest rates. Stablecoin issuers make a lot of money from the assets backing their coins. That works well when rates are high. When rates fall, the easy money gets less easy.
That exposure is the core weakness in a reserve-income model. It can look brilliant in one rate environment and much more ordinary in another. This is why analysts are watching Circle’s payments and infrastructure efforts so closely. If the company can generate meaningful fee revenue from the Circle Payments Network, B2B cross-border transfers, and settlement services, it becomes less dependent on the Federal Reserve’s mood swings.
That is the upside case. The hard part is execution.
Circle still has to compete in a market where Tether’s USDT remains the dominant stablecoin by circulating supply. USDC has been growing, but dominance in stablecoins is not handed over because one issuer gets a nicer regulatory résumé. Network effects are brutal. Liquidity attracts liquidity. Traders, exchanges, and payment flows tend to stick where the deepest pools already are.
That makes Circle’s challenge pretty blunt: keep growing USDC, prove that Arc is more than launch-day hype, and turn regulatory credibility into actual business. Otherwise, the market will keep treating Circle as a solid stablecoin franchise with an ambitious side project.
The stock’s position tells you the market still has doubts. Circle’s 52-week high is $189.92, while its 52-week low is $49.90. At $66.67, the shares are nowhere near the top of that range, which suggests investors are still waiting to see whether the growth narrative earns a higher multiple or turns into another overpromised crypto theme with a fancy slide deck.
Trading volume also picked up to roughly 12 million shares, showing this was not some sleepy move on low conviction. People are paying attention. The only question is whether they stay interested once the market moves from anticipation to evidence.
Circle is operating in one of the few parts of crypto that can plausibly become boring in the best possible way: payments, settlement, compliance, and money movement. That is not flashy. It is useful. And in finance, useful tends to beat loud, eventually.
Key takeaways
-
Why did CRCL shares rise?
Bernstein reiterated its bullish view, Circle’s USDC metrics remained strong, and Arc’s Sept. 16 mainnet launch got closer. -
What is Bernstein seeing that the market may be missing?
Bernstein thinks Circle is being valued too narrowly as a reserve-income stablecoin issuer and that payments and infrastructure could become a bigger long-term earnings engine. -
Is USDC growth enough on its own?
No. USDC supply growth is encouraging, but Circle still depends heavily on reserve income unless its payments and infrastructure businesses scale meaningfully. -
Why do the OCC authorization and New York trust charter matter?
They strengthen Circle’s regulatory footing and can make the company more credible to institutions that care about compliance and financial oversight. -
Can Arc change Circle’s business mix?
It can, but only if the mainnet launch leads to real adoption and transaction activity, not just a temporary burst of hype. -
Is Tether still the main competitor?
Yes. USDT remains the dominant stablecoin by circulating supply, so Circle still has to fight for share in a market ruled by liquidity and network effects.
Circle is trying to become more than a stablecoin company, and that is the right ambition. The market will eventually reward the part that actually works: adoption, revenue, and a product that institutions can use without holding their noses.
But ambition alone is cheap. Arc has to launch cleanly. The institutional relationships have to turn into real usage. And Circle has to prove that its future is not just tethered to reserve income with extra steps.
Circle’s $1.05B IPO triumph lit up the market, but it also sharpened the scrutiny that comes with being a public company in crypto. The honeymoon ends fast when the numbers stop impressing.
Further reading
A quick follow-up for readers who want the market angle without the fluff.
