India is finally putting its crypto regulators, tax officials, and accountants in the same room. That usually means the messy part of the market is no longer easy to ignore.
- July 2 hearing at Parliament House Annexe, New Delhi
- RBI to face lawmakers directly on crypto policy for a notable first appearance reported by the committee coverage
- ED raids tied to alleged cross-border transfers of over ₹2, 500 crore add pressure
- Tax, accounting, remittances, and stablecoins are now front and center
On July 2, India’s Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance will hear from the Reserve Bank of India and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India as lawmakers examine “A Study on Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) and Way Forward.” In plain English: India is trying to figure out what to do with crypto, how to tax it, how to account for it, and who should police the whole circus.
The timing is no accident. In June, the Enforcement Directorate raided firms including Transak, Onramp.money, and Onmeta over alleged FEMA violations tied to unauthorized cross-border crypto transfers. The tax side is heating up too. Authorities have reportedly identified nearly ₹888.82 crore in undisclosed crypto-related income and issued notices to more than 44, 000 taxpayers.
That is not a fringe-policy problem anymore. That is a government-wide headache.
The committee, chaired by BJP MP Bhartruhari Mahtab, has already held seven sittings on the issue and heard from Binance, Coinbase, CoinDCX, CoinSwitch, WazirX, FIU-IND, CBDT, IFSCA and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. July 2 adds two heavyweights to the mix, the RBI from 11:00 AM to 12:30 PM and ICAI from 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM.
The RBI’s presence matters because India’s central bank has long been the toughest adult in the room when crypto comes up. The bank has consistently warned about financial stability risks, capital flight, illicit flows and consumer harm. Crypto advocates hear obstruction. Central bankers hear a system they do not fully control. Both reactions are predictable. Only one of them writes policy, though.
The ICAI hearing matters for a different reason. Crypto regulation is not just about banning scams or licensing exchanges. It is also about taxation, valuation, disclosure and audit treatment. In other words, the boring stuff that decides whether a market can function without turning into a compliance swamp.
India’s crypto debate has been stuck in that swamp for years. The public discussion often focuses on price speculation and trading apps, but lawmakers are now staring at the plumbing underneath, how money moves, how it is reported, and how it crosses borders.
That is where the recent ED action becomes important. According to reporting on the raids, the agency said it uncovered alleged unauthorized cross-border transfers worth more than ₹2, 500 crore, with nearly ₹6 crore frozen. The action was tied to FEMA, India’s foreign exchange framework, which makes this much more than a crypto issue in the narrow sense. It is also a capital controls and remittance issue.
The companies raided, Transak, Onramp.money and Onmeta, sit in the part of the market that connects fiat money and crypto. That matters because the real compliance risk is often not in Bitcoin itself, but in the ramps, the on-ramp that turns rupees into crypto or stablecoins, and the off-ramp that turns them back into bank balance. That is where laundering, disguised remittances, and regulatory evasion tend to hide behind clean UI and marketing copy.
Stablecoins are especially relevant here. These are crypto assets pegged to another asset, usually the U.S. dollar, and they are often used for payments, settlement and cross-border transfers. For regulators, that raises a few classic concerns: dollarization, capital leakage, weak KYC/AML controls, and the possibility of using crypto rails to sidestep formal remittance channels. If policy-makers focus only on Bitcoin and ignore stablecoins, they may miss the part of the market that actually moves value at scale.
India’s challenge is not that crypto usage is tiny. It is that adoption is already large while the rulebook remains incomplete. One estimate cited in the available material puts India’s crypto user base at 119 million. The 2025 Geography of Crypto Report also ranked India No. 1 in its 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index.
That ranking is worth reading carefully. Chainalysis updated its methodology in 2025, removing the retail DeFi sub-index and adding an institutional activity sub-index, so the number is not a simple “more retail users than everyone else” scoreboard. Still, the broader point stands: India is a massive crypto market whether regulators like it or not. High adoption does not mean good policy. It often means the opposite, a market has grown faster than the state’s ability to define it.
That is why the committee’s agenda goes beyond exchange trading. Lawmakers are trying to get clarity on taxation, accounting standards, disclosure rules, audit requirements, remittances and cross-border activity. Those are not glamorous topics, but they are the ones that decide whether the sector operates in daylight or in permanent gray-zone mode.
Stablecoins in India: A Regulatory Conundrum is easy to underestimate, but it should not be. Accountants help determine how VDAs are reported on balance sheets, how gains and losses are recognized, what must be disclosed, and how auditors handle crypto exposure. If the standards are vague, firms will either overcomply, undercomply or pay consultants a small fortune to produce paperwork that still leaves everyone irritated.
There is also discussion of a possible multi-regulator framework, though no final model has been approved. Under that approach, SEBI could oversee exchanges and token offerings, the RBI could supervise cross-border crypto activity, and the Finance Ministry could handle policy and taxation. That arrangement has bureaucratic logic. It also risks becoming the usual government compromise: everyone gets a piece of authority, nobody gets a clean mandate, and the industry gets bounced between desks like a bad invoice.
Still, the fact that such a framework is being discussed is meaningful. It suggests policymakers are moving beyond one-off raids and tax notices toward a more structured way of dealing with crypto. Enforcement has its place, but it is not a substitute for rules. If the state wants compliant markets, it has to write them down instead of improvising them after the damage is done.
That is the core tension in India right now. The country has one of the largest crypto user bases in the world, but the regulatory posture remains cautious and fragmented. The RBI remains wary. Enforcement remains active. Tax authorities are already collecting. The market exists anyway.
Here are the key questions this moment raises:
-
Will the RBI soften its stance on crypto?
Probably not in a dramatic way. The RBI has long warned about financial stability, capital controls and illicit finance risks, and nothing in the current setup suggests a sudden reversal. -
Is India moving toward formal crypto rules?
Possibly, but nothing final has been approved. A multi-regulator framework is being discussed, which could mean separate oversight for exchanges, cross-border activity and taxation. -
Why do the ED raids matter so much?
Because they show regulators are focused on the real mechanics of crypto transfers, not just trading. Alleged FEMA violations and unauthorized cross-border value movement go straight to the heart of capital controls. -
Why is ICAI involved?
Because crypto policy is not only about enforcement. It is also about how VDAs are taxed, valued, disclosed and audited, the dull but decisive parts of market structure. -
Does high adoption mean India will become crypto-friendly?
Not automatically. India can have massive usage and still keep a cautious or fragmented policy stance. Adoption and approval are not the same thing.
The blunt reality is that India has a choice to make. It can keep treating crypto as a nuisance to be corralled with raids, notices and ambiguity. Or it can write rules that reflect how people actually use these networks, for trading, remittances, settlement and savings, while drawing hard lines against fraud and abuse.
Bitcoin and the broader crypto market have real demand in India. They also carry real risks. The hearing on July 2 will not settle everything, but it should make one thing clearer: the country is past the point where pretending crypto is a side issue still works.
Probe Agency ED Raids 6 Bengaluru Crypto Firms Over Rs
