Stablecoin Cards: Where the Money Goes, and What Volume Numbers Miss
Stablecoin-funded cards let people use digital-dollar balances for everyday payments. But a purchase can pass through several providers before it is complete, so headline card volume does not necessarily show what shoppers bought.
- Paymentscan tracked about $1.37 billion in October 2026 activity, not verified retail spending.
- A merchant may receive a conventional card payment while stablecoins move elsewhere in the payment chain.
- Fees, custody, refunds and tax records matter at least as much as advertised rewards.
What does $1.37 billion in tracked activity measure?
In a dashboard snapshot viewed on November 3, 2026, Paymentscan showed approximately $1.37 billion in tracked October volume and 12, 943, 643 transactions. Those figures show activity captured by the dashboard. On their own, they do not prove that customers completed $1.37 billion in purchases.
Paymentscan says its metrics can include spending, top-ups, clearing and settlements. A top-up is money added to a card account. It may be spent later, but it could also remain in the account or be moved elsewhere. A settlement record, meanwhile, may reflect money moving between businesses after many separate card purchases.
The dashboard also draws on different types of data. Paymentscan says some off-chain data for RedotPay and BFinance are self-reported by the programmes and have not been verified by Paymentscan. Users can hide off-chain data in the dashboard settings. These records can be useful indicators, but they are not the same as independently verified purchase data.
Paymentscan says it separates named programmes from residual issuer activity to reduce double-counting. Still, the dashboard combines activity types and data sources that do not all measure the same thing. Its total is best understood as tracked volume, not a clean measure of retail spending or adoption.
The stages of a card payment matter, too. Authorisation is approval of a purchase. Clearing and settlement involve later processing and the movement of funds. A transaction count may refer to one of those stages, rather than to one customer tapping a card once.
How a stablecoin card payment can work
Stablecoin cards do not all work the same way. In one example, a customer pays with a card linked to a provider-held USDC balance. The card issuer sends an authorisation through the payment network. If approved, the merchant typically receives fiat through its usual card-processing arrangements. The provider or its partners may then convert stablecoins, move funds or settle obligations elsewhere in the chain.
The parties involved, timing and settlement currency vary by programme. Some cards use custodial balances, meaning a provider holds the assets. Others let customers spend from a self-custody wallet, potentially through a smart contract authorised to use designated assets. Collateral-backed cards use posted assets to support purchases, with terms that govern when collateral can be liquidated.
That is why “on-chain” does not mean the blockchain records the entire purchase. A blockchain transfer may show funds moving between providers, but it may not show the card authorisation, what the merchant received or how a later refund was handled. The card’s brand alone does not tell customers who holds their assets or when conversion takes place.
Settlement figures are not shopping figures
Visa’s stablecoin settlement activity is another figure that should not be confused with consumer purchases. In an April update reported by crypto.news, Visa’s stablecoin settlement pilot had expanded to nine blockchains and reached a $7 billion annualised settlement run rate.
An annualised run rate projects the current pace over a year. It does not mean $7 billion was settled during a completed year. The reported figure concerns settlement between participating institutions, not purchases made with stablecoin-linked cards.
Visa has also reported more than 130 stablecoin-linked card programmes, according to crypto.news’s coverage of its April update. The number of programmes signals infrastructure activity, not how many people use the cards regularly or how much they spend. It also tells us nothing about whether those programmes offer comparable terms.
Cashback can lose to fees
Rewards only pay off once you account for fees and conversion costs. Consider a hypothetical $100 purchase in a foreign currency. At 1.5% cashback, the reward is $1.50. A hypothetical 1.75% foreign-exchange charge costs $1.75, leaving the customer 25 cents behind before other fees or exchange-rate differences.
With a hypothetical 0.5% FX charge, the same purchase would leave a $1 net reward. These examples do not describe a specific card. Actual charges, conversion spreads, eligible-spend limits and reward terms vary by provider.
Fixed fees can hit smaller transactions harder. A hypothetical $0.10 fee is 1% of a $10 purchase, but 0.1% of a $100 purchase. For a hypothetical $200 cash withdrawal, a $3 fixed fee plus a 2% charge totals $7, or 3.5%, before any local ATM or currency-conversion costs.
Annual fees deserve the same scrutiny. A hypothetical $1, 000 annual fee comes to about $83.33 per month. An extra 0.5 percentage point in cashback would require roughly $16, 667 in monthly eligible spending to offset that fee, assuming the full reward applies to all spending and ignoring limits or other benefits. That is a demanding break-even point, not a perk to brush aside in the fine print.
Custody, reversals and refunds
A card refund is a separate event from a blockchain transfer. A purchase may be authorised and then reversed before settlement, or it may settle and be refunded later. In the second case, the programme has to process a return of value. Blockchain finality does not prevent a card refund. It means the refund needs its own payment and accounting steps.
Before using a card, check where refunds go, how long they may take and what happens if the original account or wallet has changed. Find out who controls the funds, too. With a custodial balance, customers rely on the provider and its partners to hold and return assets under the product terms. With self-custody, assets stay in a user-controlled wallet, but a smart contract may be allowed to use specified funds. If the card is collateral-backed, read the conditions that govern when assets can be sold to meet obligations.
Acceptance does not guarantee access
A card network’s broad acceptance does not mean everyone in every market can apply for a particular card. Network acceptance, an issuer’s ability to offer a product in a country and an individual customer’s eligibility are separate things. Local rules, identity checks and programme terms can all limit access.
Availability can change after launch. Check the provider’s current application status, supported countries, currencies and fees instead of relying on an old announcement. “Available in many markets” does not mean “available to you.”
Spending stablecoins can create tax-recordkeeping duties
The IRS includes digital assets in its reporting framework. Its guidance says taxpayers may need to report disposing of a digital asset in exchange for goods or services, even if the transaction produces no taxable gain or loss. A reportable transaction does not automatically mean tax is owed. The outcome depends on the facts and applicable rules.
Keep records of the transaction date, the amount of the asset used, its fair market value in U.S. dollars at the time and relevant cost-basis information. A card statement may not include everything needed to work out the tax treatment. Provider records also do not replace a customer’s own recordkeeping responsibilities. Tax rules vary by jurisdiction, so check the guidance that applies where you live.
Stablecoin card questions and answers
-
Does tracked volume equal customer spending?
No. Paymentscan’s figures can include top-ups, spending, clearing and settlement activity, along with some self-reported off-chain data.
-
Does the merchant receive cryptocurrency?
Not necessarily. In a common arrangement, the merchant receives a fiat payment through the card network while stablecoins move elsewhere in the payment chain.
-
Does Visa’s $7 billion run rate measure card purchases?
No. It is an annualised settlement figure for participating institutions, not a tally of consumer purchases.
-
What product terms should customers check?
Review custody, conversion and withdrawal costs, refund handling, collateral rules, eligibility and reward limits.
-
What records should customers keep?
Keep the details needed for local tax reporting, including dates, amounts, values and relevant cost-basis information. Tax treatment depends on the jurisdiction and individual circumstances.
Useful bridge, imperfect scorekeeping
Stablecoin-funded cards can make digital-dollar balances usable at familiar payment terminals without asking each merchant to accept tokens directly. That offers a practical bridge between on-chain assets and everyday payments.
Still, a large tracked-volume figure does not prove broad adoption or better outcomes for customers. Clearer reporting would separate purchases from top-ups and settlement batches, identify self-reported data and distinguish addresses from verified people. Until then, the numbers are worth watching, but they need a careful read. Visa’s stablecoin settlement partnerships are another reason to keep institutional settlement figures separate from cardholder spending.
