XRP Liquidations Skewed 30.9-to-1 Toward Longs, but the Data Is Undated

Daily Feed
XRP Liquidations Skewed 30.9-to-1 Toward Longs, but the Data Is Undated

Reported XRP Liquidations Skew Heavily Toward Longs, but the Data Is Undated

A market report citing CoinGlass puts XRP long liquidations far above short liquidations over a 24-hour period. But it gives no publication date or timestamp, making the figures impossible to verify independently or confidently match with the accompanying price and market data.

  • Reported liquidations: $9.27 million in longs and $299, 997 in shorts.
  • What the imbalance means: Long liquidations were about 3, 090% of short liquidations, not 3, 090% more.
  • Price levels cited: $1.15 support and $1.20 resistance are technical interpretations, not guaranteed barriers.
  • Main caveat: The reporting date, measurement windows and data coverage are not specified.

What the liquidation figures show, and what they don’t

The report attributes $9.57 million in XRP liquidations across exchanges to CoinGlass. It breaks that total down into $9.27 million in long positions and $299, 997 in short positions. Together, the figures add up to $9, 569, 997, which rounds to the reported total.

The imbalance is pronounced: the reported value of liquidated longs was about 30.9 times that of liquidated shorts. That works out to approximately 3, 090% of the short-liquidation figure, or about 2, 990% more than it. The distinction matters when a percentage makes the headline.

Long positions bet that an asset’s price will rise. Short positions bet that it will fall. With leverage, a move against a trader can prompt an exchange to forcibly close the position once losses reach a required threshold. Liquidation totals measure the reported value of those forced closures, not every XRP position in the market.

A large imbalance shows which side took the bigger hit during the measured period. It does not, by itself, explain the price move or predict what happens next. The figures also depend on the data provider’s exchange coverage and measurement methods, neither of which is specified here.

The report gives a separate, shorter-period total of $853, 930, with $681, 200 in long liquidations and $172, 780 in short liquidations. Those components add up to $853, 980, a $50 difference, and the time interval is not identified. That makes the figure difficult to use as a precise comparison.

Other market figures lack clear timing

The report also lists XRP at $1.16, down 1.81%, with a market capitalization of $72.7 billion, down 1.75%. It gives open interest of $1.37 billion, up 1.4%, and says trading volume fell 44.7%.

These figures are time-sensitive, but the report provides neither a publication date nor the comparison period for each change. They should not be treated as a verified snapshot of the market at one moment.

Open interest is the value of outstanding derivatives positions. An increase can mean more exposure remains open, but it does not show whether traders are collectively bullish. Every derivatives contract has both a long and a short side. Open interest alone does not show that fresh bullish money is entering.

The report also says XRP ETFs had zero net flows on Friday. It does not identify the date, funds or data source, so the claim cannot be tied to a specific reporting period. Zero net flows would mean inflows and outflows balanced, not that the funds had no trading activity.

Price levels are scenarios, not forecasts

The report identifies $1.15 as support and says $1.00 could be the next level if XRP falls below it. It names $1.20 as immediate resistance and describes a move above that level as an uptrend signal.

These are technical-analysis views, not established market facts. No chart, timeframe or confirmation criteria explain why $1.15 is the “last” support or why crossing $1.20 would confirm a trend. Support and resistance can help frame possible scenarios, but neither level guarantees a floor, ceiling or direction.

The report also suggests that a break below $1.15 could trigger a liquidation cascade, closing almost $1 million in positions. A cascade is a chain of forced closures that can add pressure to a price move. But the report provides no dated liquidation map or calculation behind the estimate, so treat it as an unverified scenario, not a forecast.

Other reported figures, including $16.7 million in liquidations “on Friday, ” also lack a date and year. Without dated data or evidence linking the events, the claim that those liquidations followed a Bitcoin reversal on November 5 cannot be assessed.

Key questions about XRP liquidations

  • How much XRP was reportedly liquidated?

    CoinGlass figures cited in the report put the 24-hour total at $9.57 million, including $9.27 million in longs and $299, 997 in shorts. The reporting date and measurement details are missing.

  • Does the imbalance mean XRP will keep falling?

    No. It shows that reported long liquidations were much larger during the measured period. It does not predict the next price move.

  • Does rising open interest mean traders are bullish?

    No. It measures outstanding derivatives positions, not the market’s net direction.

  • Are $1.15 and $1.20 reliable price barriers?

    They are levels cited in a technical analysis, but no timeframe or confirmation method is supplied. They are not guaranteed support or resistance.

  • Does zero ETF net flow mean no trading took place?

    No. It means the reported inflows and outflows balanced for that period. The date and funds behind this particular claim are not identified.

If the CoinGlass figures are accurate, they point to a difficult stretch for leveraged XRP bulls. But without a dated snapshot and clearer information on data coverage, the imbalance shows who was forced out, not where the price is headed.

Share this article

Powered by ADBYTES

Advertise smarter.

Adbytes.Media is a transparent advertising network where advertisers reach real audiences and publishers, affiliates & everyday members earn ADBYTES tokens. Join the community and start earning today.

Back to Blog